Former Assistant to the President for Economic Policy
Pro to the question "Should the US Have Attacked Iraq?"
"Under every plausible scenario, the negative effect will be quite small relative to the economic benefits that would come from a successful prosecution of the war.
The key issue is oil, and a regime change in Iraq would facilitate an increase in world oil."
"Economic Effect of War Seen as Small: Lindsey Says Benefits of Ousting Saddam Outweigh Costs," Washington Times, Sep. 19, 2002
Experts PhD's, JD's (lawyers), Judges, Members of Congress, Ambassadors, Consulate Generals, heads of government, Cabinet-level positions, military generals/admirals, Chief Weapons Inspectors, members of legislative bodies with significant involvement in, or related to, the US - Iraq conflict. [Note: Experts definition varies by site.]
Involvement and Affiliations:
President and Chief Executive Officer, Lindsey Group, 2003-present
Director, White House National Economic Council, 2001-2002
Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, 2001-2002
Chief Economic Advisor, George W. Bush Campaign, 1999-2000
Resident Scholar and Holder of the Arthur F. Burns Chair in Economics, American Enterprise Institute, 1997-2001