Con to the question "Should the US Have Attacked Iraq?"
"Let me be clear. I do not oppose the use of force against this lawless and dangerous tyrant. But I cannot support the resolution before us as it stands. It is too broad and open-ended, and I do not believe that it is in the national security interest of the United States.
In my judgment, an invasion of Iraq at this time would make the United States less secure rather than more secure. It would make a dangerous world even more dangerous."
"Senator Conrad on Authorizing the War in Iraq," US Senate Floor Speech, Oct. 11, 2002
Experts PhD's, JD's (lawyers), Judges, Members of Congress, Ambassadors, Consulate Generals, heads of government, Cabinet-level positions, military generals/admirals, Chief Weapons Inspectors, members of legislative bodies with significant involvement in, or related to, the US - Iraq conflict. [Note: Experts definition varies by site.]
Involvement and Affiliations:
US Senator (D-ND), 1986-present
Tax Commissioner, North Dakota, 1980-1986
Chairman, Senate Budget Committee
Chairman, Subcommittee on Production and Price Competitiveness
Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security and Family Policy
Voted "America's Ten Best Senators" by TIME magazine, Apr. 2006