US - Iraq War
ProCon.org is an independent, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) nonprofit public charity
Video introduction to ProCon.org and the pros and cons of controversial topics
US - Iraq War Home
Donate now to help keep crital thinking alive!
Facebook Twitter Facebook
Should the US have attacked Iraq?
Should the US have attacked Iraq?
ARCHIVED WEBSITE: No new data posted since Dec. 31, 2011.
On March 20, 2003, a US-led coalition of 49 countries invaded Iraq and overthrew the government within three weeks. The US declared an official end to the war on Dec. 15, 2011, although some military personnel and security contractors remain in Iraq as members of the US diplomatic mission. Over 4,000 US soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died in the war.

Proponents argue that liberating the people of Iraq from Saddam Hussein’s human rights abuses, spreading democracy in the region, enforcing UN regulations, finding suspected weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), and making the US safer from terrorism in a post-9/11 world, all justified the war.

Opponents argue that Iraq had no WMDs or connection to 9/11, and that the Bush administration wanted Iraqi oil and any excuse to remove Hussein. They say the attack violated international law, killed countless civilians, wasted billions of dollars, and made the US more vulnerable to terrorism.

Core Question
Top 10 Pros & Cons
Did You Know?
Historical Timeline
Comments


ARCHIVED WEBSITE: No new data posted since Dec. 31, 2011.
On Dec. 31, 2011 we archived this site – meaning we will likely no longer make any updates to it. The site was archived because on Dec. 15, 2011 the United States declared an end to the war in Iraq and on Dec. 19, 2011 the last convoy of US troops left Iraq, thus ending the nine-year conflict which began on Mar. 23, 2003. The site will remain accessible so that our readers can continue to benefit from the information it provides. If something materially significant occurs on this subject, we may update or even "unarchive” the site. For a list of all our websites, please visit www.procon.org.

US Iraq ProCon.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit website that presents facts, studies, and pro and con statements on questions related to whether or not the US should have attacked Iraq.

Pros & Cons by Category
CORE QUESTION
  Should the US have attacked Iraq?

Justifications for Invading Iraq
  Threat from Saddam Hussein
  Weapons of Mass Destruction
  Terrorism and Terrorist Links
  Human Rights Abuses
  Iraq's Oil
  Spreading Democracy
  UN Resolution Violations
  Preemption
  Intelligence

Saddam Hussein
  Personal and Political Background
  Support and Backing
  Human Rights Abuses
  Threat from Saddam Hussein

Weapons in Iraq
  Development of Weapons
  Possession of Weapons
  Use of Weapons

US - Iraq Relations
  US Involvement with Iraq
  Gulf War I (1990-1991)
  US Presidential Debates on Iraq

Iraq's Oil
  History and Background
  Political Impact
  Post-War Issues

Iraqi Sectarianism
  Iraqi Ethnic and Religious Groups
  Sectarian Violence

Safety and Security
  US and Iraq Safety and Security
  Private Contractors in Iraq

Insurgency and Terrorism
  Insurgency
  Terrorism

Prisoners of War
  Enemy vs. Unlawful Combatants
  Abu Ghraib
  Torture

Cost of the War
  Estimates and Cost Comparisons
  Reconstruction Costs
  Casualties

The United Nations (UN)
  Background of the UN
  Sanctions and Embargo
  Oil-For-Food Program
  Weapons Inspections
  The UN Security Council and Iraq

US Troop Reduction or Withdrawal
  Pro or Con Withdrawing Troops
  Timetables and Deadlines

Share your thoughts on US-Iraq war and read, vote on, and reply to existing comments. Join the debate.


ProCon.org Notices (archived after 30 days)

Archived Notices (archived after 30 days)

Last updated on 5/3/2012 2:57:44 PM PST

Please enter a valid email address to continue.
Privacy Policy Do not show again.

© ProCon.org, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit    |    233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Santa Monica, CA 90401    |    Tel: 310-451-9596