RELIABLE.
NONPARTISAN.
EMPOWERING.

  • HOME
  • US - IRAQ WAR - MENU
    • US - IRAQ WAR - HOME
    • GET STARTED
      • Top Pro & Con Quotes Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments Historical Timeline, 1990 - 2011
    • ISSUES AND CANDIDATE STATEMENTS
      • CORE QUESTION Justifications for Invading Iraq Saddam Hussein Weapons in Iraq US - Iraq Relations Iraq's Oil Iraqi Sectarianism Safety and Security Insurgency and Terrorism Prisoners of War Cost of the War The United Nations (UN) US Troop Reduction or Withdrawal
    • RECOMMENDED
      • Did You Know? Readers' Comments Historical Timeline, Pre-History - 1989 Deaths from the War in Iraq Costs of the Iraq War Opinion Polls/Surveys Key Documents Facts About Iraq Maps of Iraq, the Middle East, and the Arab League Coalition Forces in Iraq 26 Countries' WMD Programs; A Global History of WMD Use United Nations Reference United Nations Security Council Resolutions on Iraq US-Iraq Relations by US President, 1981-Mar. 19, 2003 Bush Administration Quotes on Iraq
    • DIG DEEPER
      • Source Biographies Site Map Notices Archive Glossary Arab League Reference Ethnic and Religious Groups In Iraq Downing Street Memo Iraq Statements by Former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice Iraq Statements by Former US Department of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld Iraq Statements by Former US Secretary of State Colin Powell Iraq Statements by US President George W. Bush Iraq Statements by US Vice President Cheney New Iraqi Flag Approved by Iraqi Lawmakers President Bush Announces Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended Remarks to the United Nations Security Council from US Secretary of State Colin L. Powell. Saddam Hussein Executed on December 30, 2006 43rd US President Speaks to the United Nations General Assembly Oct. 2002 Congressional Votes Authorizing the President
        to Use Military Force Against Iraq
        Massive Reconstruction Waste in Iraq Says Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction 2012 Presidential Candidates' Positions on US-Iraq War
  • ISSUES WE COVER
    • MOST POPULAR
      • 2020 Presidential Election
      • Medical Marijuana
      • Gun Control
      • Homework
      • Animal Testing
      • Death Penalty
      • School Uniforms
      • Drinking Age - Lower It?
      • Abortion
      • Zoos
      • Illegal Immigration
    • HEALTH & MEDICINE
      • Medical Marijuana
      • Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide
      • Vaping E-Cigarettes
      • Vaccines for Kids
      • Milk - Is It Healthy?
      • OTC Birth Control
      • Abortion
      • Vegetarianism
      • Obesity a Disease?
      • Obamacare
      • Right to Health Care
      • Prescription Drug Ads
      • Marijuana for Pets
    • EDUCATION
      • School Uniforms
      • Standardized Tests
      • Tablets vs. Textbooks
      • College Education Worth It?
      • Teacher Tenure
      • Student Loan Debt
      • School Vouchers
      • Corporal Punishment
      • Banned Books
      • Homework
      • Free College
      • D.A.R.E (archived 6/3/13)
    • POLITICS
      • Death Penalty
      • Drinking Age - Lower It?
      • Illegal Immigration
      • Gun Control
      • Recreational Marijuana
      • Mandatory National Service
      • ACLU - Good for America?
      • Concealed Handguns
      • Sanctuary Cities
      • Under God in the Pledge
      • DACA & Dreamers
      • Dacota Pipeline
      • WTC Muslim Center (archived 6/3/13)
    • SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
      • Animal Testing
      • Cell Phones Radiation
      • Alternative Energy vs. Fossil Fuels
      • Climate Change
      • Net Nautrality
      • Police Body Cameras
      • Bottled Water Ban
      • Zoos
      • GMOs
    • ELECTIONS & PRESIDENTS
      • 2020 Presidential Election
      • Felon Voting
      • Election Day National Holiday
      • Electoral College
      • Lowering the Voting Age to 16
      • Voting Machines
      • Ronald Reagan
      • Bill Clinton
      • 2008 Presidential Election (archived 1/19/09)
      • 2012 Presidential Election (archived 1/22/13)
      • 2016 Presidential Election (archived 1/21/17)
    • WORLD / INTERNATIONAL
      • Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
      • Cuba Embargo
      • Drone Strikes Overseas
      • Us Drone Shot Down by Iran
      • US-Iraq War (archived 12/31/11)
    • SEX & GENDER
      • Gay Marriage
      • Prostitution - Legalize It?
      • Born Gay? Origins of Sexual Orientation
    • ENTERTAINMENT & SPORTS
      • Social Media
      • Video Games and Violence
      • Drug Use in Sports
      • Binge-Watching
      • Golf - Is It a Sport?
      • Olympics
      • National Anthem Protest
      • Fighting in Hockey
      • Pokémon
      • College Football Playoffs (archived 9/18/12)
    • ECONOMY & TAXES
      • Minimum Wage
      • Gold Standard
      • Corporate Tax Rate & Jobs
      • Churches and Taxes
      • Uber & Lyft
      • Social Security Privatization
      • Daylight Savings Time
      • Universal Basic Income
      • Penny - Keep It?
      • Big Three Auto (archived 5/15/09)
      • Insider Trading by Congress (archived 4/18/12)
    • YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
      • Watch Our Videos
      • Teachers' Corner
      • Readers' Comments
      • Who Uses ProCon.org?
      • Debate Topics
      • Testimonials
      • Donors & Sponsors
    • GET INVOLVED
      • ProCon.org Events
      • Suggest a Topic
      • Cite This Page
      • Share on Social Media
      • Volunteers / Interns
  • ABOUT US
    • ABOUT US
    • HOW WE WORK
    • WATCH OUR VIDEOS
    • FAQS
    • EVENTS
    • TESTIMONIALS
    • DONORS & SPONSORS
  • TEACHERS' CORNER
  • HOME
  • |
  • FAQS
  • |
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • |
  • DONORS & SPONSORS

  • MORE
    ISSUES
 
  • ABOUT
    US
 
  • WATCH
    OUR VIDEOS
 
  • TEACHERS'
    CORNER

US - IRAQ WAR

US - Iraq War Home Page > Theoretical Expertise Rankings

Theoretical Expertise Rankings

Evaluating the credibility of one person's statements is difficult if not impossible, especially without knowing, for example, each person's background, training, affiliations, education, or experience. However, we feel that a guide to a person's theoretical expertise can be helpful, so we have built theoretical expertise ranking charts for each ProCon.org website to help differentiate the theoretical expertise of the various sources on our sites.

  1. Our Rankings for Sources at US - Iraq War ProCon.org
  2. Our Methodology
  3. Pros and Cons of Our Theoretical Expertise Ranking System
  4. Some Flaws in Our Theoretical Expertise Ranking
  1. Our Rankings for Sources at US - Iraq War ProCon.org:

    Government Reports and Peer-Reviewed Studies
    Official vetted reports from international government bodies (such as the United Nations and the European Union), foreign governments (federal level agencies such as France’s Ministry of Justice, South Africa’s Ministry of Health, or Japan’s office of the Prime Minister), and US government agencies (state, federal, and quasi-government agencies including the Smithsonian Institution, the National Academy of Sciences, and Legal Services Corporation) and peer-reviewed studies from academic journals (such as Science, Nature, New England Journal of Medicine, etc.) tend to have multiple editorial and ideological filters, and they normally receive rigorous review from experts before being formally issued.
    Key Experts
    We do not believe that this issue has a Key Experts category. [Note: Key Experts definition varies by sites that have this designation.]
    Experts
    Individuals with PhD's, JD's, or equivalent advanced degrees in fields relevant to the US - Iraq conflict. Also top-level government officials (such as foreign leaders, US presidents, Founding Fathers, Supreme Court Justices, members of legislative bodies, cabinet members, military leaders, etc.) with positions relevant to the US - Iraq conflict.
    Media and Academic Journals
    Mainstream print, broadcast, radio, and internet media entities such as the New York Times, CNN, ABC News, National Public Radio, Slate.com, Seattlepi.com, etc., as well as influential academic journals such as the Journal of the American Medical Association, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Foreign Policy, etc.
    Organizations/VIPs/Others
    Individuals and organizations that do not fit into the other star categories.


  2. Our Methodology:

    Our theoretical expertise rankings are based upon the following premises:

    • The courts and many people equate a level of education and knowledge with a person's theoretical expertise.
    • Although ProCon.org doesn't have the resources to make complex evaluations of the expertise of each contributor to our website and such an evaluation would still contain a fair amount of subjectivity, we believe our theoretical ranking is more desirable than no ranking at all, and that it should be accurate at least 80% of the time.

    We have therefore assigned a one through five star rating based on the theoretical expertise each of our sources should possess.

    Additionally, we have customized the star categories to each of our sites' specific content because of their different subject matter.



  3. Pros and Cons of Our Theoretical Expertise Ranking System:

    Some people have praised our ranking system as a tool for differentiating the theoretical expertise of our sources. Others believe our star system should be eliminated because it is too subjective. The following chart sets out the main Pros and Cons about our theoretical expertise system:

    Pro Theoretical Expertise System Con Theoretical Expertise System
    Provides a quick guide to theoretical source quality Suggesting that one source is more theoretically expert than another reflects bias
    Our star system is based on a person's education and knowledge - a concept used in the court system to try and distinguish reliable information The number of stars prejudges sources for readers rather than allowing readers to judge the sources' expertise for themselves
    Stars add a simple and clean visual aid for a source's theoretical expertise Some 1 star individuals can be more expert than 3 or 4 starred sources. All organizations receive 1 or 2 stars regardless of their actual expertise
    We estimate our star system is accurate roughly 80% of the time We estimate our star system is inaccurate roughly 20% of the time



  4. Some Flaws in Our Theoretical Expertise Ranking:

    The following are examples of flaws or problems with our theoretical expertise rankings:

    1. Government Reports - Some have questioned why we have chosen to give government reports our highest rating of five stars.

      Our thinking is that government facts and statistics are generally reliable. However, what is less reliable, hence our lower rating, is when government personnel attempt to quote from such facts out of context, or worse when they misuse those facts on purpose or by accident.

      For example, we generally would give our highest rating--five stars, to a government report saying that there have been 52,850 killed in auto accidents in a given time period, but we would consider a government employee who said in a speech "Fifty-thousand people died last year in auto accidents" to have less expertise. The government employee would probably receive one, three, or in some cases four stars, depending on the person's education and position.

    2. Star Ranking Challenges at Organizations - We rank most organizations as 1-star because they are often dynamic and subject to myriad influences, thereby making a ranking difficult if not impossible.

    3. Expertise Leap Between One-Star Organizations and Their Five-Star Reports - A government organization would be categorized as a one-star source, but a report issued by that organization would probably receive our five-star ranking.

    4. No Background Verifications - We do not verify the professional or educational background of our sources. For instance, if someone reports that they hold a PhD, MD, or JD degree, then we presume that they hold that degree. We recognize that people may lie on their resumes, but we don't check resumes for accuracy.

    5. Each Site Has a Different Scale - Election officials are 3-star "Experts" on the Voting Machines website, but probably wouldn't be on the Euthanasia website.

    6. Some Expertise Categories Do Not Exist on Other Sites - The Born Gay website lists people with PhD's in Psychology as 4-star "Key Experts" while other sites may not even have a 4-star "Key Expert" category.

    7. Theoretical Expertise Can Change with Events - For example, leaders of Hamas were 1-star sources on the Israeli-Palestinian ProCon.org site until their party won the March 2006 Palestinian elections, and now those same people are considered 3-star sources as government officers.

    8. Determining What Is Mainstream Is Subjective - We classify media and academic journals as 2-star sources that are "mainstream" and "influential." We've done our best to determine what is "mainstream" and "influential" however such distinctions are in themselves subjective.

    9. Doctors Get 4-Stars on Medical Marijuana Site Even if They Know Nothing About Medical Marijuana - On our medical marijuana site physicians receive a 4-star rating based only on their MD degree, with no consideration of their having had any experience with, or knowledge of, medical marijuana. A PhD research scientist with extensive medical marijuana experience receives a 3-star rating.

    10. Some People with Great Actual Expertise Are Ranked as Having Low Theoretical Expertise - Some sources do have not advanced degrees or high-level government positions or other qualifications that would get them a 3 or 4 star ranking even though they may have vast experience and expertise in a subject. For example, Thomas Friedman is a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; however, since he does not have a PhD or hold a government office or otherwise meet the theoretical expertise criteria then he gets our 1-star ranking. Mary Lynn Mathre has a Masters degree in nursing and is a Registered Nurse who has worked closely for decades with patients who use medical marijuana yet she gets a 1-star ranking because she does not have an MD, PhD, JD, judgeship, or hold a government office. Norma Jean Almodovar is the Executive Director of a prostitution-related advocacy group who has worked as a call girl and a cop, yet she gets a 1-star ranking on our prostitution website because she does not have an MD, PhD, JD, or official government position.

US - Iraq War Homepage
Top Pro & Con Quotes
Top Pro & Con Quotes
Pro & Con Arguments
Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments
Historic timeline
Historical Timeline, 1990 - 2011
RECOMMENDED to you...
1
Did You Know?
2
Readers' Comments
3
Historical Timeline, Pre-History - 1989
4
Deaths from the War in Iraq
5
Costs of the Iraq War
6
Opinion Polls/Surveys
7
Key Documents
8
Facts About Iraq
9
Maps of Iraq, the Middle East, and the Arab League
10
Coalition Forces in Iraq
11
26 Countries' WMD Programs; A Global History of WMD Use
12
United Nations Reference
13
United Nations Security Council Resolutions on Iraq
14
US-Iraq Relations by US President, 1981-Mar. 19, 2003
15
Bush Administration Quotes on Iraq
+ PROS & CONS BY CATEGORY
CORE QUESTION
Justifications for Invading Iraq
Saddam Hussein
Weapons in Iraq
US - Iraq Relations
Iraq's Oil
Iraqi Sectarianism
Safety and Security
Insurgency and Terrorism
Prisoners of War
Cost of the War
The United Nations (UN)
US Troop Reduction or Withdrawal
+ DIG DEEPER...
Source Biographies
Site Map
Notices Archive
Glossary
Arab League Reference
Ethnic and Religious Groups In Iraq
Downing Street Memo
Iraq Statements by Former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice
Iraq Statements by Former US Department of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
Iraq Statements by Former US Secretary of State Colin Powell
Iraq Statements by US President George W. Bush
Iraq Statements by US Vice President Cheney
New Iraqi Flag Approved by Iraqi Lawmakers
President Bush Announces Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended
Remarks to the United Nations Security Council from US Secretary of State Colin L. Powell.
Saddam Hussein Executed on December 30, 2006
43rd US President Speaks to the United Nations General Assembly
Oct. 2002 Congressional Votes Authorizing the President
to Use Military Force Against Iraq
Massive Reconstruction Waste in Iraq Says Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction
2012 Presidential Candidates' Positions on US-Iraq War
CITE THIS PAGE
Who is the author?
SHARE
HOME
ABOUT
CITE THIS PAGE
REPRINTING POLICY
PRIVACY POLICY
DISCLAIMER
READER FAVORITES

State Laws
Debate Topics
Critical Thinking Quotes
Teaching Controversial Issues
History Of...
TRANSLATE
into 100+ Languages and Dialects
LET'S GET SOCIAL!
Tweets by @procon_org
ProCon.org is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public charity.


Contact Us

233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA 90401




Natalie Leppard
Managing Editor
procon@eb.com


© 2023 ProCon.org
All rights reserved
Contact Us

ProCon/Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
325 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 200
Chicago, Illinois 60654 USA


Natalie Leppard
Managing Editor
procon@eb.com


© 2023 Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
All rights reserved