Pro to the question "Should the US Have Attacked Iraq?"
"In the widening international and domestic debate over Iraq, some insist that US or coalition military action against Iraq today would be unlawful unless once again explicitly authorized by the Security Council. As a matter of international law, this clearly is not the case. A renewed Security Council mandate may be useful or desirable, but it is not necessary."
Cowritten with Paul Schott Stevens and Andru E. Wall, "The Just Demands of Peace and Security: International Law and the Case Against Iraq," Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, Oct. 15, 2002
Experts Individuals with PhD's, JD's, or equivalent advanced degrees in fields relevant to the US - Iraq conflict. Also top-level government officials (such as foreign leaders, US presidents, Founding Fathers, Supreme Court Justices, members of legislative bodies, cabinet members, military leaders, etc.) with positions relevant to the US - Iraq conflict.
Involvement and Affiliations:
Partner, Baker & McKenzie, LLP
Former Counsel, Projects and Structured Finance Group, Bingham McCutchen, LLP
Former Associate, Kaye Scholer, LLP and Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP
Member, Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies
Executive Committee Vice-Chairman (for Publications), International & National Security Law Practice Group